Security vulnerability and end-of-life prioritization for every web development team.

Unlike security vulnerabilities — the most urgent of which should be patched as soon as possible — EOL software should be judged according to the risk appetite of your customers and stakeholders.

A great way to kick off those decisions is by sharing the lifecycle Gantt chart with them, and planning upgrades and CAPEX spending sooner rather than later.

Executives get a bird's-eye view of the maintenance standing of their entire portfolio and operation with the Executive Health Report.

Download an example here.

Teams will be more familiar with the information, guidance, and recommendations provided by individual Application Health Reports.

Surface projects by CVE, end-of-life criticality, dependency name, or version.

Your team may have noticed a CVE affecting one project, but how do you know which others are also affected?

Using Metaport, your team can surface projects against lists of CVEs — useful when speed is key during an incident — as well as software and infrastructure components approaching end of life.

Software spends 70% of its lifetime in maintenance mode.

But without the right information, delivery teams waste time hunting for EOL dates and security information for planning and budgeting.

Metaport surfaces that data automatically and early, so teams get ahead of problems instead of reacting to them.

Traditional AppSec tooling is intended for AppSec people.

Metaport is different — it's for your whole team. Making security, planning, and engineering information available to everyone means your team has no blind spots. Everyone sees what everyone else sees.

Metaport's lifecycle chart and shared maintenance calendar give teams a clear picture of what's nearing EOL and when.

When it's shared with customers and stakeholders, everyone's on the same page.

You can also check isitendoflife.com to quickly look up EOL dates for specific technologies like Django, Drupal, or Laravel for example.

No. But it does integrate with it. Dependabot raises pull requests for outdated dependencies, but it doesn't track end-of-life and it only works with GitHub.

Metaport works across any tech stack and any VCS. It's focused on giving your team early visibility of EOL risk so you can plan upgrades with customers well in advance — rather than just flagging individual dependency issues.

Metaport currently integrates with DependencyTrack, Dependabot, Jira, and Keycloak.

Because the core is open source, developers can build additional integrations without much friction.

No, not really. Most AppSec tools focus on individual repositories, container images, or codebases — and they're designed for technical users.

Metaport gives your whole team a portfolio-wide view across all your clients' applications, and it's designed for everyone, not just engineers and security teams.

Yes.

Keeping software up to date and avoiding end-of-life components is a key part of staying compliant, and it's central to Metaport's design.

Metaport gives teams portfolio-wide visibility to surface risk and plan remediation across all their clients, reducing operational risk before it becomes a compliance issue.

Yes.

Metaport operates through organisational units (OUs), labelled "Organization" in the product. Each OU acts as an umbrella for applications, users, teams, and encryption keys.